📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #WXTM Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Celebrate CandyDrop Round 59 featuring MinoTari (WXTM) — compete for a 70,000 WXTM prize pool!
🎯 About MinoTari (WXTM)
Tari is a Rust-based blockchain protocol centered around digital assets.
It empowers creators to build new types of digital experiences and narratives.
With Tari, digitally scarce assets—like collectibles or in-game items—unlock new business opportunities for creators.
🎨 Event Period:
Aug 7, 2025, 09:00 – Aug 12, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate:
Post original content on Gate Square related to WXTM or its
DeFi Security Offense and Defense: In-depth Analysis of Common Vulnerabilities and Protection Strategies
Common Security Vulnerabilities in DeFi and Preventive Measures
Recently, a security expert shared a lesson on DeFi security for community members. The expert reviewed the major security incidents that the Web3 industry has encountered over the past year, discussed the reasons behind these events and how to avoid them, summarized common security vulnerabilities of smart contracts and preventive measures, and provided some security advice for project parties and ordinary users.
Common types of DeFi vulnerabilities mainly include flash loans, price manipulation, function permission issues, arbitrary external calls, fallback function problems, business logic vulnerabilities, private key leakage, and reentrancy, among others. This article will focus on flash loans, price manipulation, and reentrancy attacks.
Flash Loan
Flash loans are an innovation of Decentralized Finance, but they are often exploited by hackers for attacks. Attackers borrow large amounts of funds through flash loans to manipulate prices or attack business logic. Developers need to consider whether contract functions may become abnormal due to large amounts of funds, or whether it is possible to interact with multiple functions in a single transaction to obtain improper rewards through large amounts of funds.
Many DeFi projects appear to offer high returns, but in reality, the level of the project teams varies widely. Some projects may have their code purchased, and even if the code itself has no vulnerabilities, there may still be logical issues. For example, some projects distribute rewards at fixed times based on the number of tokens held by holders, but attackers can exploit flash loans to purchase a large number of tokens and obtain most of the rewards when the distribution occurs.
Price Manipulation
Price manipulation issues are closely related to flash loans, mainly because certain parameters in price calculation can be controlled by users. There are two common types of issues:
Reentrancy Attack
Reentrancy attacks are one of the main dangers that can be faced when calling external contracts. An attacker may take control of the control flow and make unexpected changes to the data.
There are many ways that reentrancy can occur with different contracts, potentially involving different functions of the contract or functions of multiple different contracts. When addressing the issue of reentrancy, the following points should be noted:
In the Web3 space, using mature security practices is wiser than reinventing the wheel. Utilizing well-validated solutions can significantly reduce the likelihood of issues arising.
Project Party Security Recommendations
How Users Can Determine if a Smart Contract is Safe
By paying attention to these points, users can better assess the security of smart contracts and reduce the risks associated with participating in Decentralized Finance projects.