OP_NET and Arch: Similarities and Differences of New Bitcoin Smart Contracts Solutions and Their Prospects

robot
Abstract generation in progress

New Bitcoin Smart Contracts Solution: Similarities and Differences between OP_NET and Arch

Recently, the two Bitcoin mainnet smart contract implementation solutions, OP_NET and Arch, have sparked widespread discussion. Although the name OP_NET is similar to OP_CAT, the nature of the two is completely different.

OP_CAT is an opcode in Bitcoin used for string concatenation. Its revival requires a soft fork, and relevant proposals are still underway. Although it has already been enabled on BCH and BSV, specific use cases remain somewhat abstract. The revival of OP_CAT may be the first step in the development of Bitcoin smart contracts, and more opcodes may be unlocked in the future.

In contrast, OP_NET belongs to the "protocol" category similar to runes, BRC-20, and ARC-20. Its technical framework includes the Bitcoin mainnet as the "action initiation layer" and "final confirmation layer", as well as the "execution layer" composed of OP_VM and OP_NET nodes.

A brief analysis of the two latest Bitcoin smart contracts implementation solutions: What are the differences between OP_NET and Arch?

The workflow of OP_NET is as follows: Users initiate transactions on the Bitcoin mainnet, and the transaction data contains the "BSI" identifier. After the transaction is confirmed, OP_VM executes contract operations and updates the status, which is confirmed by OP_NET nodes. The final result is provided to Bitcoin applications, and the operational results of the applications will also be submitted to the mainnet.

The transaction fees for OP_NET include Bitcoin network fees and OP_NET transaction fees. The latter consists of execution fees and priority fees, both paid in Bitcoin. Any amount exceeding 0.0025 Bitcoin will be "burned", and the remaining amount will serve as rewards for node operators.

Arch is positioned as "Bitcoin Layer 1.5", which is a layer of smart contracts built on the Bitcoin mainnet. It has raised $7 million in seed funding and will issue its own token as the Gas fee and staking token for PoS network validators.

A brief analysis of two latest Bitcoin smart contracts implementation solutions: What are the differences between OP_NET and Arch?

The workflow of Arch is as follows: Users initiate transactions from the Bitcoin mainnet, Arch nodes process and validate the transactions, and the leader node is responsible for creating the Arch network block and submitting the finally confirmed transactions back to the mainnet. Arch uses the "FROST + ROAST" signature scheme, which ensures network stability as long as 51% of the network members cooperate honestly.

Although Arch has its own token as Gas fees, users can still pay with Bitcoin, and the backend will handle the fee conversion without the need for an additional wallet.

In general, OP_NET and Arch have similarities in technical implementation, both using the Bitcoin mainnet as the "initiating end" and "confirmation layer", while serving as the "execution layer". However, their positioning is different; OP_NET is more like a "protocol", while Arch is "Bitcoin Layer 1.5".

A brief analysis of the two latest Bitcoin smart contracts implementation solutions: What are the differences between OP_NET and Arch?

Although the block time of the Bitcoin mainnet may limit the application efficiency of these development schemes, their exploration still brings new possibilities for the development of the Bitcoin ecosystem. In the future, Arch plans to conduct a Token Generation Event (TGE) in the first quarter of next year, which may launch related testing activities or applications based on Arch. The current development of OP_NET may be influenced by the overall enthusiasm of the ecosystem.

OP-1.3%
NET-8.09%
ARCH0.33%
BTC-1.01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 19h ago
I feel that arch is more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdroppervip
· 08-11 08:45
It's a bit of an old trap like brc20.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9vip
· 08-10 15:32
Just炒 it, don't worry about anything else.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 08-09 16:15
There are good reasons to go long Bitcoin in the over-the-counter market.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 08-09 16:10
Why is there again something new? The crypto world is really too restless.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSnipervip
· 08-09 16:06
This wave of smart contracts competition is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 08-09 16:04
You might want to give this a try, but what's the big deal?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000vip
· 08-09 16:04
Playing with Operation Code again, right?
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignalvip
· 08-09 16:00
I wish I had known that when I grew up, Bitcoin would be used for smart contracts.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Banditvip
· 08-09 15:49
been mining btc since 2013... seen this movie before tbh
Reply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)